(Not to be copied without authorsÕ permission)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PHALLACY

 

 

 

(A play)

 

 

 

 

 

By Carl Djerassi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Program Note

 

Some time ago, Professors Alfred Vendl and Bernhard Pichler of the University for Applied Arts in Vienna drew my attention to a superb life-sized bronze of a naked young man that for several centuries had been described as a Roman original. Recent modern chemical analysis in their laboratory revealed that it was a Renaissance cast. The overnight loss of approximately 1400 irreplaceable years had many consequences for the museum that for over a century had displayed the sculpture as a jewel of its Antiquities collection. Aesthetically speaking, does that revisionist attribution make the sculpture less valuable? Does pricking the balloon of financial inflation automatically also diminish the art historical merit of the sculpture or the viewerÕs pleasure in its beauty? And what about the art historianÕs personal and professional response when an unblemished favorite suddenly becomes irretrievably tainted?

 

For decades, I, a chemist-turned-playwright, have also been a serious art collector, who has been well aware of the disturbing fetishization of many art objects. But instead of addressing primarily the change in value as a well known art object is reattributed--a situation quite different when a work, say a presumed Vermeer painting, is found to be forged by Van Meegeren--I decided to focus on what effect such reattribution might have on the behavior of the principals involved in the dispute.

 

This dramatic lode has been mined before. Alan BennettÕs play and subsequent BBC TV film, ÒA Question of Attribution,Ó uses the question of a Titian paintingÕs authenticity to depict the relation between art historian (Sir Anthony Blunt) and owner (Queen Elizabeth II) as well as BluntÕs behavior as a notorious Communist spy. And Simon GrayÕs more recent ÒThe Old MastersÓ-though ostensibly covering the dispute whether a certain painting was created by Titian rather than Giorgione-really delves into the ethical and psychological conflict between art historian (Bernard Berenson) and art dealer (Lord Duveen). In other words, the principals and the art in those plays have a historical basis, which however has been altered to make a dramatic point.

 

And what is that point in my ÒPhallacyÓ? Here I concern myself with a conflict much closer to my professional competence: the quirks and idiosyncrasies of art historian and scientist, when they examine the age of an art object from their grossly different perspectives: aesthetic and art historical connoisseurship versus cold material analysis. In addition, I also wanted to explore the ramifications of a well known character fault that transcends the gulf been art scholar and scientist: falling in love with a favorite hypothesis and defending it against all comers and new evidence.

 

Like other playwrights working with factual material, I have modified, manipulated, disguised or even deliberately misused many historical nuggets by claiming the authorial freedom that any playwright rightly exercises. Thus I request that any resemblance to the actual principals associated with the ongoing saga of the putative Roman sculpture in the Antiquities collection of a famous European museum be largely ascribed to coincidence and that in no respect have I attempted to damage the reputation of a living scholar. And if the explanation in my play of what has happened to that original sculpture should in the future prove to be correct, it is not a reflection of my art historical acumen but purely a playwrightÕs dumb luck.

 

Aside from my interest as a scientist and art collector, there is a deeply personal reason why I chose this theme for my newest play. Born in Vienna, I emigrated after the Nazi Anschluss to the USA, where I became a research scientist. In 2004, the Austrian Government offered me Austrian citizenship. Since by that time, I had turned into a playwright, what better token of reconciliation than creation of a play that I situated in the city of my birth?

 

Carl Djerassi

 

London, Singapore, Eugene, and Hamburg, Oct. 2004 - Jan. 2005

 


Cast

 

DR. REGINA LEITNER-OPFERMANN, middle aged art historian and director of the Department of Antiquities in an important Austrian museum.

 

EMMA FINGER, assistant curator of the Renaissance Art Department, late twenties or early thirties.

 

DR. REX STOLZFUSS, middle aged Professor of Chemistry and head of the art conservation department of an unnamed technical institution in Austria.

 

DR. OTTO ELLENBOGEN, late twenties or early thirties, recent Ph.D. and assistant to Prof. Stolzfuss.

 

GERALDO LOPEZ, Spaniard of undetermined occupation (same actor as Otto Ellenbogen, but speaking with Spanish accent).

 

DON JUAN OF AUSTRIA (1547 - 1578), illegitimate son of Emperor Charles V and Hero of the Battle of Lepanto (25 years old).

 

BARBARA BLOMBERG, Don JuanÕs mother (43 years old).

 

VOICE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT (sitting in back row of the theatre).

 

TIME

 

The recent past in Vienna except for some scenes in Luxemburg in 1572 during Don JuanÕs historically documented stop on his way from Spain to the Netherlands.

 

 


Scene 1. Present time. REGINA Leitner-Opfermann, director of the Antiquities Department of the Museum is evidently concluding a lecture to a group of high school students.

 

REGINA (With kind and animated voice): So, let me summarize the salient points of my lecture. I know your teachers expect you to take notesÉ and I have no doubt that theyÕre going to test you later. But there will be time to ask your questions on the tour of our Antiquities Galleries. For nowÉ please, put away your pens and pencils. And use your eyes, your hearts, your souls.... Absorb the beauty of this, the most important piece of our Antiquities Galleries: a Roman sculpture from the second century. Discovered right here in Austria.

 

(Flash up image of a bronze sculpture of a naked young man on the screen.)

 

IÕm sure your chemistry teacher has told you that bronze is a metal alloy made by melting copper and tin in varying proportions. You may even have been told that bronze melts readily and is easily molded. And that it does not rust, is durable, and takes a fine smooth finish. You may even have been told about the additional presence of trace metals, but frankly who cares? ItÕs all a bit dull if you donÕt learn to what fantastically beautiful use this material can be put. You wonÕt learn that in chemistry!

 

Bronze casting is at least 6,000 years old. The earliest bronze works were solid. It would be 2,000 years before artisans were able to cast hollow interiors, which opened the door to creating larger works like this beautiful young man, here. In the sixth century B.C. the Greeks brought bronze casting to a level of perfection never before achieved.

 

Tragically, during the Middle Ages, the acute shortage of metal needed for weaponry led to the majority of Greek bronze statues being melted down. The ones you can see in museums are mostly survivors that had been lost at sea or that had been buried for safe-keepingÉ and accidentally retrieved centuries laterÉ a fact that is crucial to what youÕll see shortly on our tour.

And finally, the Romans. Their artistic education began during their conquests of the Greek cities and the plunder of thousands of the greatest Greek sculptures. The desire to collect and hoard was apparently insatiable among the wealthy Romans, and after the supply of originals was exhausted, copies were created. Hence, even if most valuable originals were irreparably lost, their images have been preserved in Roman copies.

This young man is one of the most beautiful and best preserved Roman bronzes that was uncovered 500 years agoÉ not in ItalyÉ but in our own country. And nowÉ letÕs go and visit this crown jewel of our Antiquities Collection.

 

REGINA is interrupted by a voice coming from the theatre.

 

TEENAGE VOICE (from audience): Frau Director. A question.

REGINA (Faintly annoyed): IÕll answer questions during the tour. (Beat). All right. One question.

TEENAGE VOICE (from audience): If this sculpture is just a copy of a Greek original—

REGINA (Sharply interrupts): We do not know whether it is what you call just a copyÉ we believe that it is actually a Roman original of around 200 AD influenced by the Greek aesthetics of the Polyclitus school

VOICE (Same teenager from audience): But how can you tell whether it is a Roman original?

REGINA (Turning defensive): Young man, I have written an entire book on the subject. You should read it. (SheÕs about to leave and then has another thought). Suppose he were just a copy. What then? My figure has not lost an iota of its ravishing beauty. If it were a Roman cast of a Greek original, it would then be a clone of the originalÉ and hence as beautiful. You know, most modern sculptors authorize several bronze casts. The art market considers them contemporary clones and therefore equally valuable. So whatÕs the difference with our ravishing figure here?

VOICE (Same teenager from audience): But a Roman copy of a Greek original is not contemporary—

REGINA (Now truly annoyed): ThatÕs enough, thank you! WeÕre late for the tour. If you still have some questions, come see me in my office.

 (Steps off podium. EMMA intercepts her.)

EMMA: Frau Director Leitner—

REGINA: Leitner- Opfermann.

EMMA: Sorry.

REGINA: Well?

EMMA: IÕm Emma FingerÉ Renaissance departmentÉ. WeÕve met a few times before—

REGINA: Yes.

EMMA: Yes. I just wanted to introduce myselfÉ since weÕll be working together.

REGINA (Surprised): Oh? On what?

EMMA: You havenÕt read the report?

REGINA: What report?

EMMA: Professor Stolzfuss—

REGINA: I hardly know him. WhatÕs this all about?

EMMA: IÕm sorry, I thought the Museum Director had informed you of the situation.

REGINA: Well, he hasnÕt, and neither has anyone else. Now, if youÕll excuse me, I have to lead a tour.

 

Scene 2. A few days later. ReginaÕs office.

 

REX: You donÕt have much use for chemistry, do you?

 

REGINA (Disingenuously): Professor Stolzfuss! Now what makes you say that?

 

REX: My son told me about your lecture.

 

REGINA: Your son was there?

 

REX: According to him, you thought trace metals in bronze were a bit of a bore.

 

REGINA: Is that what I said? Frankly, my lecture dealt with the history and beauty of antique bronzesÉ not chemistry. I barely mentioned your field.

 

REX: It registered with my son.

 

REGINA: I suppose it would with the son of a chemistry professor. (Beat). There was a boy who kept asking questions.

 

REX: That would be him.

 

REGINA: You put him up to it?

 

REX: No, noÉ

 

REGINA: Are you quite sure?

 

REX: I told him about our work on your sculpture, and he—

 

REGINA (Starting to get angry): You did what?

 

REX: I told him about the results of our work.

 

REGINA: I see. And you think that was appropriate? Telling your son about results that weÕre only discussing now?

 

REX: ItÕs not a state secret. Your museum director had asked me to take a look at your sculpture-

 

REGINA: ÒTake a look?Ó

 

REX: Yes. We developed some new chemical methods. We got some top-notch new equipment. WhatÕs wrong with the museum commissioning a new approach to confirm the putative age of a sculpture-?

 

REGINA (Wounded): Putative?

 

REX: ItÕs not an insult. More often than not, age is considered putative until itÕs confirmedÉ even the age of a person. Take my son. In another couple of years, heÕll have to produce a driverÕs license in order to buy a drink.

 

REGINA (Sarcastic): And our museum director came to you for the driverÕs license of this bronze?

 

REX (Enjoying the direction of the conversation): Just a parking permit. Doubts have been expressed whether it truly belongs in the Antiquities galleries.

 

REGINA: Are you aware of the evidence I have amassed over years of research? Summarized in a scholarly book that has already been reprinted?

 

REX: By your museum bookshop.

 

REGINA: YouÕve read the book?

 

REX: I always read evidence before questioning it.

 

REGINA: Are you suggesting I donÕt?

 

REX: It is not meant personally. A scientistÕs business is to question all evidence and then to confirm or refute it through independent means.

 

REGINA: You read my book from beginning to end?

 

REX: Eventually. But I started at the end.

 

REGINA: You mean the last chapter?

 

REX: The index.

 

REGINA: The index?

 

REX: Yes, the index. And looked for the words Òtrace analysisÓ and Ònickel.Ó Now of course, their absence is clearer since according to my son you find them dull.

 

REGINA: Why did you start with those words?

 

REX: Because Roman bronze has a very low Nickel content.

 

REGINA (Sarcastically): I am delighted to hear that.

 

REX: I wouldnÕt be if I were you.

 

REGINA: Why not?

 

REX: Your sculpture contains a lot of nickel. Rather typical of Renaissance bronze. (Beat).

 

REGINA: Say that again.

 

REX: The nickel content of the sculpture is typical of Renaissance—

 

REGINA (Interrupting): And you told this to our Museum Director?

 

REX: Of course.

 

REGINA: Instead of coming to me?

 

REX: ButÉ he was the one who requested we examine your sculpture. Anyway, what matters here is the nickel content.

 

REGINA: YouÕre saying that our sculpture could not be of Roman origin? That all Roman bronzes, without exception, had low nickel content?

 

REX: I didnÕt say without exception—

 

REGINA: You see?

 

REX: IÕm saying itÕs extremely unlikely. And thatÕs why IÕm here. As a courtesy call. To tell youÉ before informing anyone elseÉ what additional chemical tests we carried out to prove our assumption-

 

REGINA (Pouncing on this): Assumption!

 

REX: Yes.

 

REGINA: So, youÕre just making an assumption?

 

REX: Well, no, because we carried out further tests—

 

REGINA: Nonetheless, these tests were all based on your assumption. You assumed that the sculpture is a Renaissance work. That all the evidence in my bookÉ all 345 pagesÉ is hogwash.

 

REX: WellÉ hogwash, noÉ I wouldnÕt say that, not exactly hogwash—

 

REGINA: You see, this is what I find so I infuriating. You slavishly follow the rules of chemistry you learned as a studentÉ lessons you now teach to your studentsÉ who will then teach it to their students, itÕs sterile crap—

 

REX (Outraged): Crap?

 

REGINA (Ignores interruption): I said ÒsterileÓ crapÉ consisting of rules promoted by art-hating boors, shielded from any sense of beauty by a dense fog spread from ear to ear. You disembowel every vestige of aestheticsÉ you ignore style, form, patinaÉ in fact all connotative accompaniments. (Deep breath). You remind me of É an overzealous mouse trying to act like a rat.

 

REX: Excuse me?

 

REGINA: Someone really ought to prick that balloon of self-righteousÉ pompousÉ simplistic arrogance of yours. No, not simplisticÉcocksure. Transforming the wine of aesthetics into vinegar! How typical of you chemists. When chemists dabble with art, the best that can be said is the results are unpredictable.

 

REX: Unpredictability is what science is all aboutÉ

 

REGINA: Is it really? Then why doesnÕt that teach you humilityÉ rather than arrogance? And why not recognize the importance of visual beautyÉ a concept that barely exists in your chemical world.

 

REX: For this discussion, the beauty of the sculpture is not important. Even the sculpture is not important—

 

REGINA: So what is?

 

REX: Truth.

 

REGINA: ThatÕs all?

 

REX: ThatÕs all.

 

REGINA: How pathetic. And if the beauty of this sculpture is not important, what about art?

 

REX: Define Art.

 

REGINA: An image from the mirror of life.

 

REX (Derisive): Good God!

 

REGINA: All right then. How about Art being everything other than what you see in the mirror?

 

REX: Better! But how necessary is that?

 

REGINA: Art is never necessary. It just happens to be indispensable.

 

 

Scene 3.  EmmaÕs office.

 

 

EMMA: She was still steaming when she told me about her meeting.

 

OTTO: She really described him as an overzealous mouse?

 

EMMA: What are you getting so worked up about?

 

OTTO: She meant all chemists, which includes me. If youÕre going to side with your boss, what are you doing hanging out with the enemy?

 

EMMA: SheÕs not my boss. I am a curator in the Renaissance department. I was lent to her by the big bossÉ the museum directorÉ to help her get out of this mess. Because a mess in the Antiquities department is a mess for the museumÉ especially when dealing with such an important work. Besides, IÕm not hanging out with youÉ IÕve barely started hanging out.

 

OTTO: It must be chemistry.

 

EMMA (Teasing): The authority speaking.

 

OTTO: You knowÉ I think IÕm in love with you.

 

EMMA: Nice change of topic. You never told me that before.

 

OTTO: Not in so many words.

 

EMMA: But youÕre quoting.

 

OTTO: What do you mean?

 

EMMA: ItÕs a quoteÉ itÕs been said millions of times.

 

OTTO: But thatÕs true of everything said between lovers.

 

EMMA: Listen. ThereÕs still a way to go on that lover front.

 

OTTO: WellÉ what would you say if you loved someone?

 

EMMA: You want to hear it now?

 

OTTO: Of course.

 

EMMA (Reflective): If I really loved him? (Pause). I might say: ÒIs there a way to keep my soul from touching yours

 

OTTO (Startled and pleased): Wow! Did you just think of that?

 

EMMA (Softer). ÒBut everything that touches me and you/draws us together, making one from two,/as one bow gives two strings a single tongue.Ò

 

OTTO: My God!

 

EMMA: ÒUpon what instrument are we two spanned? And what musician holds us in his hand

 

OTTO: You couldnÕt have thought of that just now.

 

EMMA: I didnÕtÉ I remembered it. Because IÕm wondering whether one single voice can be teased out of two such different strings as yours and mine?

 

OTTO: Who wrote that?

 

EMMA: Rainer Maria Rilke.

 

OTTO: So you were quoting as well.

 

EMMA: YesÉ but that wasnÕt said millions of times before.

 

OTTO: Frau Opfermann has turned you against me.

 

EMMA: She doesnÕt know about you. (Beat). And her name is Leitner-Opfermann. Opfermann was the name of her former husband.

 

OTTO (Dismissive and mocking): ÒLeitner-Opfermann!Ó I canÕt stand those hyphenated names. They reek of compromise.

 

EMMA: She wonÕt drop it because she made the mistake of publishing her book under that name. A book whose basic premise your hapless professor is now questioning. She expects to be called Frau Director Leitner-Opfermann. How long have you been in Vienna?

 

OTTO: Long enough.

 

EMMA: Clearly not long enough to understand that titles still count for something here.

 

OTTO: Not with everyone. I call my boss ÒRex.Ó

 

EMMA: Not ÒProfessor?Ó

 

OTTO: IÕd barely started working in his lab when one day he said, ÒJust call me Rex.Ó He laughed, but I knew what he meant. A king doesnÕt need another title.

 

EMMA: I hate to think what would happen if I called her by her first name.

 

 

Scene 4.  ReginaÕs office.  Continuing where we left off with Rex and Regina.

 

REGINA: What do you think of Klee?

 

REX: IÕm into bronzeÉ not clay.

 

REGINA: Paul Klee.

 

REX: I see.

 

REGINA (Dismissive): So you have heard of him?

 

REX: I donÕt have to put up with this.

 

REGINA: WellÉ how do you like Klee?

 

REX: Is this relevant?

 

REGINA: Indeed. Because hereÕs what Klee told a chemistÉ

 

REX (Prickly): What kind of a chemist? Analytical? Organic ? Physical? (Beat). Or was it a cook that he mistook for a chemist?

 

REGINA: A famous chemist.

 

REX: WhatÕs his name?

 

REGINA: A Nobel Prize winning chemistÉ who liked lecturing to artists about his scientific theory of colour.

 

REX: DonÕt tell meÉ Wilhelm Ostwald.

 

REGINA: Yes, if you must know.

 

REX: And what did Klee say to Ostwald?

 

REGINA: ÒYour scientific ideas just fetter us artists. They renounce the wealth of the soul. Thanks, but no thanks!Ó Well whatÕs good enough for Paul Klee is certainly good enough for me. So let me repeat: ÒThanks, but no thanks.Ó

 

REX: IÕve had it! I tried to be collegial—

 

REGINA: Collegial?

 

REX: I wanted to explain how we arrived at our conclusion—

 

REGINA: You think I need an explanation?

 

REX (Sarcastic): Oh pardon me! I forgot. You have no use for trace metal analysis, but youÕre an expert in thermoluminescenceÉ and scanning electron microscopy. In their scope and limitations—

 

REGINA: Their limitations! Exactly.

 

REX: YouÕre impossible! HereÉ (hands over the report he wrote). Read it.

 

REGINA: I donÕt need to read thisÉ IÕll just file it in the only place I file such rubbish.

 

REX: In that caseÉ wait till itÕs published! And the shit hits the fan!

 

REGINA (Taken aback): You plan to publish this?

 

 

Scene 5.  EmmaÕs office.  Continuing where we left off with Emma and Otto.

 

OTTO: SoÉthe Frau Director knows nothing about us?

 

EMMA: ThereÕs nothing to know.

 

OTTO: Yet.

 

EMMA (Beat, then): No. Will you tell your Rex?

 

OTTO: No.

 

EMMA: Good. And what about us two? Is continued shoptalk wise?

 

OTTO: Why not?

 

EMMA: It might be smarter if we didnÕt. That argument isnÕt overÉ itÕs just begun.

 

OTTO: What do you mean not over?

 

EMMA: Because I know whatÕs at stake. I work thereÉ and a museum is not a lab.

 

OTTO (Touchily): Meaning?

 

EMMA: At the end of the day, when you leave your lab, you leave it and your experiment stays behind. When I leave the museum, the work goes with meÉ

 

OTTO: So my work is just a job, while yours is a life?

 

EMMA (Laughs): I wouldnÕt have put it quite so bluntly. But I deal with images.

 

OTTO: You canÕt slide a knife between art and science!

 

EMMA: Of course you can. (Beat). Art historians do it all the time.

 

OTTO: Believe me, sheÕs going to feel so sick that she started this.

 

EMMA: Not Regina Leitner-Opferman. She has a cast iron stomach.

 

OTTO: Maybe. But chemists know their poisons. And Rex is one of the best in the business.

  

                        (He leans over trying to kiss her, but she pushes him away.)

 

EMMA: Uh-huh! How do I know your kisses arenÕt poisonous?

 

 

Scene 6. Later that day.  ReginaÕs office.

 

REGINA (Sarcastic): So his eminence thought my department needed help?

 

EMMA: He thought my Renaissance background would be useful. (Beat) He would like to salvage the situation.

 

REGINA (Bitterly): WouldnÕt we all?

 

EMMA: You know, I do want to help. But if IÕm just in your way—

 

REGINA: Forget it. Even if youÕre just trying to be polite, I shouldnÕt take it out on you. I should blame myself.

 

           (Long pause with Emma starting to get uncomfortable)

 

REGINA (Suddenly): Have you ever been in love?

 

(Notices EmmaÕs surprise)

 

I mean truly in love. Convinced that thereÕs nobody like thatÉ and never will be?

 

EMMA (Embarrassed, searches for words): Maybe not quite like that.

 

REGINA (Dismissive): Of course not. YouÕre too young. So pay attention.

 

                  Suddenly changes demeanor and voice, now low, almost pleading.

 

IÕve lived with that young man for years. But instead of taking him for grantedÉ or even worse, getting bored with himÉ heÕs turned into an ever-increasing passion. When I thought that there wasnÕt a millimetre of his body I had not exploredÉ suddenlyÉ sometimes in the middle of the nightÉ a missing detail would hit me. Do you know what sort of details?

 

EMMA (Confused and embarrassed): No.

 

REGINA (Dismissive): Of course you canÕt. (Pause). Say the space between his big toe and the adjoining one. Whether there was any difference between the left and the right foot. (Almost demandingly). Have you ever run your finger between a manÕs toes?

 

EMMA (Embarrassed): I donÕt rememberÉ probably not.

 

REGINA: Then you havenÕt because you wouldÕve remembered it. Now! You have seen him. So how tall do you think he is?

 

EMMA (Startled): OhÉ I donÕt knowÉ 1.7 or 1.8 meters.

 

REGINA: 1.835 meters! (Pause). What about the width of his head?

 

EMMA: I have no idea.

 

REGINA: 20.5 centimeters! The length of his face?

 

EMMA (Taken aback): I donÕt know.

 

REGINA: 18.2 centimeters. The distance from his hairline to the nose?

 

EMMA (Deeply embarrassed): Please donÕt!

 

REGINA (Ever more obsessive and progressively faster): 4.5 centimeters. The length of his nose? 6.2 centimeters! From the nose to his chin? 6.5 centimeters. Inner width of his eyes? 3.5. The distance of one eye to the other? (Beat). Never mind. But donÕt think I just remember the face. (Increasingly rapid). Width of his shoulders? 46 centimeters. Distance of AdamÕs apple to navel? 41.4 centimeters. Distance between his nipples? 27.5 centimeters. Length of his thighs? 57 centimeters. (Suddenly turns silent).

 

EMMA (Totally embarrassed): May I leave?

 

REGINA (Absentminded): What?

 

EMMA: I said, may I leave?

 

REGINA: Not yet. (Beat) The moment I laid eyes on him, I felt a wave of intuitive attractionÉ of feeling he was authentic. I was so besotted by the accuracy of my hunch that I ignored my own warning signals, including the untarnished state of the patina. You donÕt know what IÕm talking about, do you?

 

EMMA: Not entirely.

 

REGINA: Art historians acquire a powerful unconscious ability.  We have the capacity to sift huge amounts of information, blend data, isolate telling details, and come to astonishingly rapid conclusions, even in the first few seconds of seeing something. (Beat). Sounds conceited, I know. Bernard Berenson was like that. Of course, it comes from years of examining art.

 

Long pause.

 

But there is a problem if one depends on such hunches.

 

EMMA (increasingly uncomfortable): They donÕt always work.

 

REGINA: Right! And now I have to find a way of rectifying my mistake without giving that chemist the satisfaction that he did it.

 

 

Scene 7. Later that day.  RexÕs office.

 

REX: Do you know what that woman said? What she dared say to me? (Tries to mimic ReginaÕs tone). ÒYour scientific ideas just fetter us artists, you renounce the wealth of the soul.... Thanks, but no thanks!Ó

 

OTTO: She was quoting Paul Klee.

 

REX (Astonished): How on earth did you know that?

 

OTTO (Realizing he should not have volunteered that information): OhÉ from some artÉ friend.

 

REX: WeÕre going to rewrite our paper.

 

OTTO: But thereÕs no need. The point has been made. The energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis showing a nickel content much too high for a Roman bronze. The thermoluminescence data. The computer tomography—

 

REX: Forget about our fancy science! I was prepared to use itÉ thenÉ when I was still thinking of professional collegiality. When I was prepared to publish something jointly with her that would avoid a public embarrassment. But after that barrage of insults, collegiality is the last thing IÕm thinking of. This is war! (Short pause). IÕm not saying we eliminate the scientific evidenceÉ just underplay it. I want every reader of that paper to realize that sophisticated science wasnÕt needed to demonstrate how wrong they were. Simple horse-senseÉ uncontaminated by all that art historian crap. Its bad enough that sheÕs mocking professional scientists, but sheÕs only an art historian.

 

OTTO: YouÕre not actually going to say that?

 

REX: IÕd love toÉ but weÕd never get that into print, weÕll write it so that every reader still recognizes it for what it really is.

 

 

Scene 8.   ReginaÕs office.  Continuing where we left off with Regina and Emma.

 

REGINA: Why did I ignore it?

 

EMMA: What?

 

REGINA: For me he was so perfect. I didnÕt want to face this one blemish. A plugged hole on the top of his head. Never in my worst nightmare would IÕve guessed that this dismal orifice would be the fatal flawÉ I couldÕve worked it all out by myself so easily. Tomorrow, IÕve got to give a talk to our sponsors. But after that, weÕve got to plan. There must be a way out.

 

 

Scene 9.  RexÕs office. Continuing where we left off with Rex and Otto.

 

REX: WeÕll start with the hole.

 

OTTO: Why?

 

REX: I thought youÕd be pleased. YouÕre the one who first stuck his nose into it. I was too busy focusing on the bronze. After allÉ isnÕt that what made my labÕs reputation? Analyzing bronzeÉ preserving it—

 

OTTO: Even faking itÉ to perfection.

 

REX: Watch what youÕre saying, young man! What I told you was that given what weÕve learned about bronze analysis, we could fake any bronze and even fool the experts. YouÕve never heard me sayÉ I repeat: neverÉ that we would commit a forgery.

 

OTTO: Sorry.

 

REX: What made you open it in the first place?

 

OTTO: Curiosity.

 

REX: Commendable.

 

OTTO: Although you werenÕt exactly crazy about my idea to get hold of an endoscope and look all the way inside.

 

REX: Just wait till you turn fifty and your doctor tells you itÕs time you have your first colonoscopy. Having someone stick an endoscope up your rear turns you off from sticking it anywhere.

 

OTTO: It was worth it. You could see the armatureÉ and the thickness.

 

REX: Precisely. So letÕs rub it in. 

 

(Otto produces a little notebook from his pocket and begins furiously taking notes during RexÕs next speech.)

 

WeÕll point out that no endoscope was needed to see the error. Roman casts were never more than five millimeters thick. This was twenty! One could see that practically with the naked eye once the hole was unplugged. Renaissance casts were that thick because the sculptors got paid by weight. Even an art historian would have noticedÉ but they hardly ever look inside. ItÕs always on the surface. (Mocking tone): Òsensitivity of visual perceptionÓÉ Òcritical connoisseurshipÓÉ But itÕs all based on external observation. TheyÕre blinded by the self-assurance of their aesthetic infallibility.

 

(Rex sees Otto still writing.)

 

REX: DonÕt put that in the reportÉ thatÕs just between you and me. No, start with the hole. Show that once it was opened, calipers would have sufficed to determine the thickness.

 

OTTO: What about all the work I did, especially the thermoluminescence? That was unambiguous evidence. Are we ignoring all that?

 

REX: Yes.

 

OTTO: But—

 

REX: No buts.

 

OTTO: OkayÉ okay.

 

REX: Good. Now get on with it.

 

OTTO: You donÕt need collaboratorsÉ you need slaves.

 

REX: You know what she called me? That arrogant, vain, supercilious, pretentiousÉ

 

OTTO: You were going to tell me what she called you!

 

REX: ÒCocksure.Ó SheÉ who never mentioned his penis in all her 345 pages. Not one entry under ÒpenisÓ in the index! And then she calls me ÒcocksureÓ!

 

(Rex exits.)

 

(from offstage)  Why arenÕt you working?!!

 

 

Scene 10. The following day.  REGINA presenting a lecture 

 

REGINA (Video showing overall sculpture): Allow your gaze to fall upon this stunning masterpieceÉ first, its overall cardinal constancy, coupled with a dash of impetuousness. But then resist the temptation of starting with the face. Start the way I did when I first encountered him: From the baseÉ

 

(Video zooms to toes)

 

É for instanceÉ those perfectÉ almost delectable toes. And thenÉ the feet fastÉ the shin and calves well favored; knee ever so gently flexed; thighs so shapely yet solid; and then the proud loinsÉ

 

(Just before reaching the penis, the video image turns to show buttocks).

 

And the buttocks with their bivalve roundnessÉ (As zoomed video image travels upward from navel): Navel discreet; young chest manly and rippling É adorned by nipples perceptive; throat unflawed; chin almost unreal; lower lipÉ so tempting. (Beat). The noseÉaquiline and Roman; and the eyesÉ though a sculptureÕs dead eyesÉ limpidly seductive and simultaneously blazing. And nowÉ those beguiling curlsÉ those tantalizing ringlets. Let us start over here. (Points with laser pointer). Five of them twirling to the leftÉ then eight coiling to the rightÉ and now thirteen! In other wordsÉ the famous Fibonacci sequence. I shall not ask the trite question whether this unknown sculptor genius was also a mathematicianÉ

 

 

Scene 11. Immediately after ReginaÕs lecture.  EmmaÕs office.

 

OTTO: Jesus!

 

EMMA:  Be gratefulÉ it wasnÕt easy to smuggle you in. At least, youÕve now heard her at her best.

 

OTTO (Derisive): ÒDelectable toes!Ó

 

EMMA: Why not? Not so long ago, you said something like that about mine.

 

OTTO: I was talking about fleshÉ not bronze. ÒButtocks with their bivalve roundness!Ó She couldnÕt have thought of that on the spur of the moment.

 

EMMA: She was quoting. SheÕs good at it.

 

OTTO: And even better at not citing the source, apparently.

 

EMMA: The black and white scientist! Always insisting on true or falseÉ the bon mot cited or not cited. How about just discreetly borrowed?

 

OTTO: How about precious.

 

EMMA: At times, precious discourse in museums does work. This was a discourse to our potential sponsors. And a rather effective one at that.

 

OTTO: And that stuff about the Fibonacci sequence?

 

EMMA: Oh, that. ThatÕs her favorite line. She always uses it.

 

OTTO: All that simulated aesthetic bliss. I thought she was going to have an orgasm.

 

EMMA: You mean you missed it? She had at least two.

 

OTTO: Probably faked ones.

 

EMMA: What do you men know about faked orgasms?

 

(This stings him a little.)

 

OTTO: As a matter of fact, she missed something.

 

EMMA: Oh?

 

OTTO: The penis.

 

EMMA: What about it?

 

OTTO: Small.

 

EMMA: HeÕs young.

 

OTTO: HeÕs at least twenty. Cocks stop growing at seventeen.

 

EMMA (Sarcastic): You donÕt say!É weÕre dealing with aesthetics hereÉ

 

OTTO: Jesus! You sound like her!

 

EMMA: É with conceptual coherenceÉ

 

OTTO: I thought we shared an interest in the study of the penis.

 

EMMA: But where? In art, literature, anthropology, medicine? 

 

OTTO: How about in bed?

 

EMMA: Otto. This is a museum.-

 

OTTO: WhatÔs your ReginaÕs hang-up? Considering the fact that she covered every millimeter of that precious bodyÉ yet ignored one of the most important appendages.

 

EMMA: SometimesÉ not mentioning a feature emphasizes its importance.

 

OTTO: Feature?!

 

EMMA: There are timesÉ especially in artÉ when the penis is only a feature. In most classical Greek art, nude males have small penises. On purposeÉ as a sign of an aristocratic male. The Greeks didnÕt make an issue out of sizeÉ on the contrary, the point was daintiness.

 

OTTO: You must be kidding.

 

EMMA: Seeing the small flaccid phallus in the openly displayed male nude and then contrasting it with an engorged jutting protuberance—

 

OTTO (Pretends outrage): Protuberance?

 

EMMA: The tiny one in publicÉ the oversized erect one in private. Enjoying the best of both possible worlds: conventional modesty and yet—

 

OTTO (Disdainful): Very small and then oversized? ThatÕs an anatomical contradiction!

 

EMMA: We are dealing with convention in Greek art and societyÉ not anatomy.

 

OTTO: ThatÕs pretty subtle.

 

EMMA: Subtlety may be one of the key differences between science and art.

 

OTTO: For ChristÕs sake—

 

EMMA: All rightÉ take Christ. Take ChristÕs penis.

 

OTTO (Taken aback): Blasphemous.

 

EMMA: Hardly. Do you know what art historians have to say about ChristÕs sexuality?

 

OTTO: I didnÕt know this was a subject of discussion among your clique.

 

EMMA: Do you know that in the hundredsÉ no, thousands... of Renaissance pictures of the Madonna and Child, there is hardly one that doesnÕt show the penis of the Christ child? Look here. From the exhibition I curated recentlyÉ

 

(MantegnaÕs painting, preferably with close-up focus on infant Jesus)

 

 

OTTO: Your point being!

 

EMMA: Look! They even have him play with his penis.

 

            (Sodoma painting)

 

LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01

 

OTTO (Momentarily taken aback): WellÉ infants are known to do that.

 

EMMA: Of course they doÉ even though some adults are shocked. But what about his grandmother fondling his penis?

 

            (Baldung woodcut)

 

 LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01

 

OTTO: His Grandmother?

 

EMMA: St. Anne. But now take the images of the adult Jesus from that period. In most paintings, heÕs virtually naked, but invariably some drape or fold covers his loins. But as always, there are the odd exceptions.

 

OTTO (Testily): Meaning?

 

EMMA (Goading him): The occasional erection.

 

OTTO (Shocked): YouÕre joking!

 

EMMA: Relax! ItÕs coveredÉ though not too subtly.

 

(1520-1525 images of van HeemskerckÕs and Ludwig KrugÕs engraving of ÒMan of SorrowsÓ

 

LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01

 

So whatÕs the artistÕs point?

 

OTTO: To show that Jesus was a man.

 

EMMA (Ironic): Brilliant! But that has already been established in all the nude baby Jesuses and their penises. NowÉ aside from that signifier—

 

OTTO (Dismissive): Oh, God! No, not signifier!

 

EMMA: ThatÕs exactly what the penis is, a signifier. But since it is usually associated with reproduction—

 

OTTO: Not pleasure?

 

EMMA: And pleasure. But neither reproduction nor physical pleasure had anything to do with Jesus, so his groin is never openly displayed. Never!

 

OTTO: What is this? A prickly lecture?

 

EMMA (Reaches over and unzips his fly, pulling his shirt tail out).

 

OTTO (Grabs her hand): What are you doing? Someone might come in!

 

EMMA: Now, do you see?

 

OTTO: See what?

 

EMMA: There are times and places when the penis is neither displayed nor discussed. Now, go away, IÕve got work to do.

 

OTTO: What about lunch?

 

(He zips his fly back up)

 

EMMA: Out before the Frau Director catches you. (She bundles him out of the office)

 

 

Scene 12. Later that day.  ReginaÕs office.

 

REGINA: They lapped it up, didnÕt they?

 

EMMA: You were very persuasive.

 

REGINA: Who was that man you were with at my lecture? I couldnÕt see him properly.

 

EMMA (Taken aback): Just an acquaintance.

 

REGINA: What does he do?

 

EMMA (Now desperate to change the subject): Dull stuff. (Beat). I noticed you skipped the usual introduction.

 

REGINA: What?

 

EMMA: The oldest Roman sculpture discovered north of Italy?

 

REGINA: ThatÕs why I didnÕt take any questions. What if someone had brought it up? His Eminence already asked: what will the museumÕs official line be?

 

EMMA: And your reply?

 

REGINA: That weÕre working on it.

 

 

Scene 13 Luxemburg, 1576 during Don Juan of AustriaÕs voyage from Spain to assume his

 duties as Governor General (Generalstatthalter) of the Netherlands.

 

A room in Don JuanÕs residence. Blomberg, wearing a veil, waits. As Don Juan enters, she makes a gesture of supplication to him, going down on her knees.

 

DON JUAN: Madam! Please, rise.

 

(She stays still.)

 

DON JUAN: Very well, but I assure you thereÕs no need. Will you allow me to sit?

 

            (She nods.)

 

DON JUAN: Thank you. (He takes a seat.) Now. What favor did you come to ask? (Louder when she does not reply). I said: what favor? (Beat). Madam! Is your hearing impaired? (She shakes her head.) Then speak. (Beat) I cannot know what troubles you unless you tell me. (Beat) Your name then? (Beat) Come, come, thereÕs no need to be afraid! Out with it. (Beat) Why wonÕt you speak? (Beat) Do we know each other? (She nods) Then take off your veil. (Louder). Take it off! I have witnessed many terrible things in battles. Faces of men mutilated beyond recognition. If you are scarred or ugly, fear no shame in front of me. (Beat) Madam! You try my patience! 

 

            Slowly, she removes the veil.

 

DON JUAN (Taken aback): But you have no reason to hide your faceÉ thereÕs barely a blemish. I feel as though we have met beforeÉ somewhere.

 

BLOMBERG: Sire, IÕm your mother.

 

 

Scene 14  The next day.  RexÕs office and ReginaÕs office, split scene.

 

REX: WhatÕs your hypothesis?

 

OTTO: About what?

 

REX: WhatÕs Leitner-Opfermann going to do? I told the Museum Director that I was working on the formal report for him and he told me to take my time. I wonder whether heÕs trying to protect her.

 

OTTO: Why ask me?

 

REX (Laughs): I like to hear my younger colleagueÕs opinions.

 

OTTO: Only to then demolish them.

 

REX: Correction! Try to demolish them. ThatÕs what science is all aboutÉ a lesson that Frau Dr. Leitner-Opfermann does not seem to have learned. To her, counterarguments are just personal affronts. Well? LetÕs hear your hypothesis.

 

OTTO (Clearly uncomfortable): I wouldnÕt want to guess.

 

REX: IÕm not out to screw up things for the Museum.

 

OTTO: But thereÕs nothing to screw up! ItÕs either a Roman cast or itÕs not. Like pregnancy. The woman is pregnantÉ or sheÕs not.

 

REX (Laughs loudly): But whoÕs the daddy?

 

OTTO: You have something in mind, donÕt you?

 

REX: Maybe. Has Leitner-Opfermann ever met you?

 

OTTO: No.

 

REX: Seen you?

 

OTTO: I donÕt know.

 

REX: What do you mean you donÕt know?

 

OTTO (Uncomfortable): WellÉ I went to one of her lectures.

 

REX: Oh? How small was the audience?

 

OTTO: The room was overflowing.

 

REX: Really?

 

OTTO: SheÕs a pretty flamboyant lecturer.

 

REX: All icing, no cake?

 

OTTO: No, some cake.

 

REX: WellÉ if the place was full she wouldnÕt have noticed you. (Beat). IÕd like you to do some snooping aroundÉ discreetly.

 

OTTO: Why?

 

REX: Have you read her book?

 

OTTO: No.

 

REX: You should. ItÕs not badÉ in spite of myopic arty-fartiness. But she has a lot at stakeÉ I just wonder what sheÕs up to? (Beat). IÕll tell you what IÕll do. IÕll call her to see whether she has calmed down. If she has, IÕll give her another chance.

 

OTTO (Surprised): YouÕll do that?

 

(OTTO excuses himself and calls EMMA.  EMMAÕs cell phone rings) 

 

REGINA: Would you please shut off that infernal instrument!

 

EMMA (Embarrassed): IÕm terribly sorry. I thought it was off. It wonÕt happen again. One second. (Turns away, whispering into phone). Not now!

 

OTTO: ItÕs me.

 

EMMA (Whispers while shaking her head): Uh-uh.

 

OTTO: Are you in her office?

 

EMMA: Yes.

 

OTTO: Make some excuse.

 

EMMA: Uh-uh.

 

OTTO: Rex is calling her.

 

EMMA: What?

 

OTTO: One sec.

 

REX:  Take your time. (Lifts desk phone and dials).

 

REGINA: Emma!

 

EMMA (To Otto): Gotta go.

 

OTTO: Wait! You must prepare her!

 

ReginaÕs phone rings. She picks it up.

 

REGINA (Irritated): Yes? (Pause).

 

REX: Stolzfuss speaking.

 

OTTO: Listen.

 

REGINA: Yes. (Turns away from Emma).

 

EMMA (Turns away from Regina): Quick then.

 

REX: I would like to give you one more chance.

 

OTTO: ThereÕs one more possibility.

 

REGINA: One more chance?

 

EMMA: For what?

 

OTTO: Compromise.

 

REX: A ceasefire.

 

REGINA: YouÕre prepared to apologize?

 

EMMA: HeÕll apologize?

 

OTTO: Apologize?

 

REX: I should apologize? I?

 

EMMA: Yes!

 

REGINA: What?

 

OTTO: We have nothing to apologize for.

 

REX: I havenÕt even started and youÕre asking me to apologize?

 

REGINA: IÕm talking about your report.

 

EMMA: So youÕre on his side?

 

REX: And IÕm talking about its contents.

 

OTTO: IÕm working for him.

 

REGINA: In that case there is nothing more to discuss.

 

REX: What?

 

REGINA: (Slams down the phone). What a jerk!

 

REX: (Slams down the phone). What a bitch!

 

EMMA (Quick): IÕve got to go. (Does so).

 

OTTO: What! What? Hello? (Realizes she hung up). Now what?

             

REGINA: Do you know who called?

 

EMMA (Quietly): I can guess.

 

REGINA: I wonder why he called?

 

EMMA: So do I.

 

REGINA: I shouldnÕt have lost my temperÉ at least not before finding out what heÕs up to. I donÕt trust that manÉ or that stooge of his, whatÕs his name?

 

EMMA: Otto Ellenbogen.

 

REGINA: You know him?

 

EMMA (Disingenuously): What do I know about chemists?

 

REGINA: Keep away from them. TheyÕre poison. And if theyÕre not poison, theyÕre plebeians. Correction! TheyÕre bullies. And scientific bullies are the worst kindÉ because they try smothering you with facts. Words like ÒbeautyÓÉ Òaesthetic perspectiveÓÉ even Òhistorical provenanceÓÉ donÕt exist in their vocabulary. I wouldnÕt be surprised if he comes out with the story about Michelangelo and the Cupid he buried in a garden in Rome. Hmm, well weÕll show him what provenance can do!

 

EMMA: We?

 

REGINA: Yes, because youÕre going to help me search for supporting evidence.

 

EMMA: And if I do find something?

 

REGINA: You tell meÉ but no one else. As a Renaissance scholar I presume you speak some Spanish?

 

EMMA: Claro.

 

REGINA: What about reading old Spanish texts?

 

EMMA (Smiling): No hay problema.

 

REGINA: Good girl!

 

 

Scene 15 SECOND DON JUAN/BARBARA BLOMBERG INTERMEZZO picking up on the first intermezzo in exactly the same place where it ended)

BLOMBERG: I promised the King, your brother, never to see you again.

 

DON JUAN: And what have you to do with the King, my brother? He is not your son.

 

BLOMBERG: You share the same father.

 

DON JUAN: Father? Yes. (Sharply). But not legitimacyÉ or power.

 

BLOMBERG: The Emperor recognized you as his sonÉ

 

DON JUAN: When I was 12. But for my fatherÕs generosityÉ the Court would never have accepted me.

 

BLOMBERG: The dark shadow of my error.

 

DON JUAN: To have yielded to the EmperorÕs desire?

 

BLOMBERG: Sire, I have never regretted that. But to have borne—

 

DON JUAN (Bitterly): His bastard!

 

BLOMBERG: His son, a hero.

 

DON JUAN: They call me the Imperial BastardÉ not to my face, of courseÉ and think IÕm not privy to their thoughtsÉ or to my brotherÕs. (With increasing bitterness). His Majesty, Philip II, husband of Queen Mary of England, who denied me the rightÉ after my return from victorious battleÉ to wed Mary Stuart of Scotland! (Angrily and with increasing speed). HeÉ Philip IIÉ King of Spain and of Castile, Leon, Aragon, the two Sicilies, Jerusalem, Navarre, Granada, Toledo, Valencia, Galicia, Majorca, Seville, Sardinia, Corsica, Murcia, JaŽn, the Algarbes, Algeciras, Gibraltar, the Canary Islands, the Indies, and all the islands and lands of the Ocean-Sea, Count of Barcelona, Lord of Biscay and Molina, Duke of Athens and Neopatria, Count of Rousillon and Sardinia, Marquis of Aristan and Sociano, Duke of Brabant and of Milan, Count of Florence and of the Tyrol. (Stops suddenly, switching tone and speed). I could go on. Yet my brother never shared any with me... not one kingdomÉ not even Naples or Sardinia!  Who saved the Holy Roman Empire from being overrun by the Ottomans? WhoÉ led the Holy Catholic LeagueÕs fleet out of Messina against the Turks and vanquished them?

 

BLOMBERG My sonÉ not yet 24, the hero of the Battle of Lepanto.  I beg you, Sire, indulge me. I may never see you again. (Beat). You were born on the 24th day of February in the year 1547: Also the day of the EmperorÕs birth. (Beat). Nine months before, His Imperial Majesty, Charles V, came to Regensburg. It was Spring. I stood in front of a sculptureÉ waving like so many othersÉ as the emperor passed.

 

DON JUAN (Not disguising his impatience): And?

 

BLOMBERG: He noticed—

 

DON JUAN: The sculpture?

 

BLOMBERG: Who knows? But he noticed me.

 

DON JUAN (Curious): Why you?

 

BLOMBERG: They say I was beautifulÉ then.

 

DON JUAN (Kinder): Your appearance still pleases the eye.

 

BLOMBERG: Your Highness flatters me. My years and travails have taken their toll. (Beat). But that night, I was conductedÉ in strictest privacyÉ to the Emperor. His Majesty was 46 and long widowed. He seemed lonelyÉ and desired solace from me. I was but 18É and still unacquainted with the ways of men.  We spent the night. I never saw his Majesty again.

 

Scene 16 REXÕs office.  Continuing where we left off.

 

OTTO: That was quick.

 

REX: I donÕt know why I bothered.

 

OTTO: I didnÕt think it was such a good idea giving her a call.

 

REX (Defensively): To give her one more chance to see whether we could arrive at a joint statement that wouldnÕt embarrass her? I thought it was damn generous of me.

 

OTTO: How could you avoid embarrassing her? Any concession would be an embarrassment. SheÕs a true believer.

 

REX: WhatÕs belief other than a source of energy? In this case, the source is a battery that is about to go flat.

 

OTTO: Who knows? She may well try to recharge it.

 

REX: Otto! Do you know something I donÕt?

 

OTTO (Disingenuously) That, Herr Professor, is impossible.

 

 

Scene 17  ReginaÕs office.  Continuing where we left off.

 

EMMA: So far so good. But whatÕs your hypothesis?

 

REGINA: That the originalÉ the one dug up in 1502É went to one of the Spanish Habsburgs, while we were left with the 16th century cast.

 

EMMA: And you just thought of all thisÉ after the chemists questioned the age of our bronze?

 

REGINA: No. Years ago. When I first worked on my book.

 

EMMA: But IÕve read your bookÉ from beginning to end. Even the dedication: ÒTo Ignaz Opfermann, supporter and life companion.Ó

 

REGINA: I forgot to delete that page when they reprinted it.

 

EMMA: ThereÕs no mention of the HabsburgsÉ at least no Spanish ones.

 

REGINA: I know.

 

EMMA: Why nowÉ but not then?

 

REGINA: It was a Spanish Habsburg insurance policyÉ in case my Roman theory was off the mark. Unfortunately, I was so in love with my theory, I pursued it.

 

EMMA: So who ended up with the Roman original?

 

REGINA: Good question.

 

EMMA: Any hints?

 

REGINA: There are always hints for a plausible hypothesisÉ. especially with the Habsburgs.

 

 

Scene 18 THIRD DON JUAN/BARBARA BLOMBERG INTERMEZZO)

 

DON JUAN:  You never saw my father again?

 

BLOMBERG: Never.

 

DON JUAN: But you spoke?

 

BLOMBERG: YesÉ that night. But I in German and his Majesty in Castilian.

 

DON JUAN: What did my father say?

 

BLOMBERG: I do not know. Then, I only knew my mother tongue. But he was kind. (Long pause). YetÉ

 

DON JUAN: Yet?

 

BLOMBERG: Nine months laterÉ when I bore a sonÉ I was persuaded by the EmperorÕs emissary to wed one of his officers. A bribe.

 

DON JUAN: Madam! You must choose your words more prudently.

 

BLOMBERG: I was favoured with a payment of 5000 florins and the promise of 100 Thalers annually once I was married to that officer. (Bitterly). Some, of course, might call it a token of generosity. (Beat) Or perhaps affection?

 

DON JUAN: What happened then?

 

BLOMBERG: Not yet four, my son was removed by his MajestyÕs violist, Francisco Massi. It was the last time I saw you, SireÉ until today.

 

DON JUAN (Reminisces): Massi and Donna Ana brought me to Spain. For three years, they treated me kindly. When I was seven, the EmperorÕs confidante, Don Luis Quijada and his wife, Donna Magdalena took me into their home where I was tutored in Greek, Latin and FrenchÉ not German. But also in matters of the Court.

 

BLOMBERG: I was never told.

 

DON JUAN: Ever since I have called Donna Magdalena ÒmotherÓÉ (Pause) until today.

 

BLOMBERG: My sonÉ When did you first encounter your father?

 

DON JUAN: After his abdicationÉ in ExtremaduraÉ in the monastery of Yuste. But then, I did not know he was my fatherÉ not until after his death. His Majesty, King Philip, himself showed me the secret codicil to the EmperorÕs will in which he recognized me as his son. I have never forgotten the words that changed my life. Do you want to hear them?

 

BLOMBERG: I would be honored

 

DON JUAN: (Quotes). ÒI state and declare that, while a resident in Germany, and after I became a widower, I had an illegitimate son named Jerom’n by an unmarried woman.Ó (Looks at her and pauses).

 

BLOMBERG: No name for her?

 

DON JUAN: (With compassion): No name.

 

BLOMBERG: Is there more?

 

DON JUAN: There isÉ but only about me.

 

BLOMBERG: May I hear it?

 

DON JUAN: ÒI charge my son, Prince Philip, that he be given duchies in the Kingdom of Naples for payment of an annual income as well as honouring his natural brother as Don Juan of Austria and oblige others to do likewise, have for him all proper respect, and compel the carrying out, compliance, and execution of all of the terms and provisions of this codicil.Ó (Beat). I am now Lieutenant Governor and Captain-General of the Low Countries.

 

BLOMBERG: The EmperorÉ in heavenÉ will be pleased how the people and King Philip now honour you.

 

DON JUAN: Governing the Low Countries? An impossible taskÉ as my brother well knowsÉ and hence assigned to me.

 

BLOMBERG: Nothing is impossible for the Hero of Lepanto.

 

DON JUAN (Suddenly spent): We shall see, yet now your hero is afraid.

 

 

Scene 19   ReginaÕs office.  Continuing where we left with Regina and Emma

 

EMMA: Ok, so this is where I come in. Just think how many Habsburgs there were in the 16th and 17th centuries.

 

REGINA: How about Emperor Charles V?

 

EMMA: An obvious candidate.

 

REGINA: But?

 

EMMA: If heÕd gotten it, there would have been some record. Every day of his life has been accounted for. There is his son, Philip II. But there are lots of othersÉeven some women. Is there more?

 

REGINA: A hint. We need facts. Hard facts. Ideally, unimpeachable facts to convert the hint into a plausible hypothesis. If you find them, weÕll package them with grace and wit. To overcome this (again pointing to pages in front of her) accretion of pedestrian chemical detritus. HereÉ (reaches into drawer to produce some sheets of paper). Read thisÉ my notes from way back. The details of a hypothesis that never made it into my book.

 

EMMA: And where do you want me to start?

 

REGINA: Buy a round trip to Spain. But make it Austrian AirlinesÉ not Iberia. IÕm charging this to the directorÕs budget.

 

 

Scene 20. A couple of weeks later.

 

OTTO: WhatÕs going on with you? I leave messages, which you donÕt answer—

 

EMMA (Interrupts): IÕve been awfully busy.

 

OTTO: And when I do reach youÉ you keep stalling.

 

EMMA: I told youÉ my new project. Roman antiquities are not exactly my mŽtier. I have a lot of catching up to do.

 

OTTO: Day and night?

 

EMMA: Yes. She doesnÕt have much time. The Museum director is bugging her.

 

OTTO: What are those people after? They canÕt show weÕre wrong.

 

EMMA: We donÕt question the chemical evidence.

 

OTTO: We? You mean, youÕre taking her side? Look. ItÕs quite simple. The sculpture was cast in 1548.

 

EMMA: What makes you so sure?

 

OTTO: I was the one who did the thermoluminescence work—

 

EMMA: Which leads to such precise dating? How?

 

OTTO: After I opened the hole in his head, I dug a small piece of ceramic out of the inside of the sculpture—

 

EMMA (Impatient): And?

 

OTTO: With thermoluminescence, you can determine the exact date when the ceramic was subjected last to high heatÉ itÕs all in the report weÕre sending to the Museum DirectorÉ

 

EMMA: And which you intend to publish?

 

OTTO: Of course. Just quote this as a private communication from one of the authorsÉ and then be done with itÉ and then meet me for dinner.

 

EMMA: And bring Leitner-Opfermann along? So she can congratulate you?

 

OTTO: Well if youÕre not going to shower me with your admiration right hereÉ then do it at dinner. And if not at dinner, then—

 

EMMA: ItÕs all about her. ItÕs her projectÉ itÕs her life work. Our Museum director sent me to help her and I plan to do so.

 

OTTO (Getting curious): What can you people still do about him?

 

EMMA: Plenty.

 

OTTO: No. ItÕs settled once and for all.

 

EMMA: Perhaps for you . But not for us.

 

OTTO: Emma. Why bother crossing tÕs or dotting IÕs?

 

EMMA: How about changing a page or a chapter if not the entire book?

 

OTTO: I smell your (smirking) Frau Director Dr. Leitner-Opfermann behind such conceit.

 

EMMA: Leave her alone. YouÕve barely met her. BesidesÉ itÕs also turned into my conceit.

 

OTTO (Surprised): I donÕt believe it.

 

EMMA: ThatÕs your problem.

 

OTTO (Slightly backtracking): SorryÉ I didnÕt mean that.

 

EMMA: I think you didÉ forget it. So youÕre satisfied with finding the cast was made in 1548? ThatÕs it?

 

OTTO: But what else is there?

 

EMMA: You donÕt think to ask, Òwhy and where it was cast, and who did it?Ó

 

OTTO (Irritated): All right! Why?

 

EMMA: I donÕt know. (Beat).

 

OTTO: Are you sure? (Beat). YouÕd tell me if you did, wouldnÕt you? Emma?

 

EMMA: Talking about privileged information is dangerous.

 

OTTO: What? (Beat) Even between us?

 

EMMA: That doesnÕt make it less privileged. And if youÕre snooping, then itÕs verboten.

 

OTTO: WhatÕs come over you?

 

EMMA: Regina thinks she is on the track of an explanation that would make your work not wrongÉ but trivial.

 

OTTO (Outraged): Trivial?

 

EMMA: You heard me.

 

OTTO (Trying to let it go): LetÕs drop the subjectÉ and be nice to each other. How about dinner tonight?

 

EMMA: I canÕt.

 

OTTO: Tomorrow?

 

EMMA: I wish I could. But IÕve got to pack and get ready for a trip.

 

OTTO: For how long?

 

EMMA: ItÕs open-ended.

 

OTTO: I see. (Beat) Am I allowed to know where youÕre going? Or am I snooping?

 

EMMA: Spain.

 

OTTO: Really? Hey – IÕve got an idea. Let me go with you. I can be your translator. For years I spent my holidays at my grandfatherÕs house in Ibiza.

 

EMMA (Realizing she should not have offered that information). Please keep quiet about Spain. And I donÕt need a translator.

 

OTTO (Getting curious): Why Spain??

 

            She is silent.

 

Oh, Emma! We canÕt go on like this all day! Just tell me!

 

EMMA: All right, butÉ keep it to yourself.

 

OTTO: Of course! What do you take me for? I wish youÕd trust me just for once!

 

 

Scene 21  Later that day.  RexÕs office.

 

REX: Spain?

 

OTTO: Hm-mm.

 

REX: I wonder what Leitner- Opfermann is up to nowÉ sending her little Finger to Spain. (Musingly). Any idea?

 

OTTO: WellÉ I think sheÕs trying to get out of the corner youÕve painted her in.

 

REX: Now, now! YouÕre the one with paint all over his hands. You deserve much of the creditÉ

 

OTTO (Hesitatingly): I think sheÕs denying that whatÕs standing in the Museum is only a 16th century cast.

 

REX (Becoming suspicious): Are you guessing or do you know?

 

OTTO: IÕm putting two and two together.

 

REX: Well? Out with it!

 

OTTO: I think she believes that the original is somewhere in Spain.

 

REX: You mean, they dug it up in Spain and then made a cast there in the 16th century to ship it up here? Ridiculous!

 

OTTO: How about the reverse? The cast was made hereÉ in AustriaÉ and the Roman original shipped to Spain?

 

REX: And sheÕs trying to find it?

 

OTTO: I guess so.

 

REX: WhatÕs your evidence?

 

OTTO: Reading between the lines.

 

REX: What lines?

 

OTTO: Oh, you know. JustÉlinesÉthings I pick up here and there.

 

REX: And your source?

 

OTTO: Source? Well, no one in particular.

 

REX: I see. You wouldnÕt want to point aÉ (beat) finger at anyoneÉ would you? (Beat)  Okay! If she wants a Spanish explanation, IÕll give her one.

 

 

Scene 22  Later that day.  ReginaÕs office.

 

REGINA: Start in Aranjuez. Check the Royal Gardens of the period. See what you can find out about the two sculptures that disappeared a couple of hundred years ago.

 

EMMA: The ones in your notes? (Points to papers in her hand). One male, one female? Are they a matching pair?

 

REGINA: Nobody knows. But thatÕs an important point.

 

EMMA: WhatÕs the evidence that one was Venus?

 

REGINA: Indirect. One of the inventories mentions a Venus donated around that time by Francesco de Medici that ended up in the Royal Gardens.

 

EMMA: A gift to Philip II?

 

REGINA: Apparently. And presented by the Medicis in Florence.

 

EMMA: That may be worth looking into.

 

REGINA: I wish I had pursued that myselfÉ Mea Culpa.

 

EMMA: And the sculptures disappeared?

 

REGINA: Both at the same timeÉ in the 19th century. Suggesting that they were a pair.

 

EMMA: Or belonged to the same owner?

 

REGINA: Precisely. So why not start in Aranjuez? And a special bonus: Did you know that Aranjuez has the best strawberries in Spain?

 

 

Scene 23  A few days later.  RexÕs office.

 

OTTO: Here I am. Quite a mysterious summons.

 

REX: Nothing mysteriousÉ just hush hush. IÕm about to ask you something IÕve never done before. Drop everything youÕre doing. I want you to start on a project that shouldnÕt take more than eight weeksÉ meaning it must be finished in seven. Is that understood?

 

OTTO (Attempting banter): WhatÕs the alternative?

 

REX (Firmly): There isnÕt any.

 

OTTO: Sounds serious.

 

REX: And important. Better take some notes. You know that we still have the complete computer scan of the sculpture. (Rex punches up image on the computer screen)

 

OTTO: You mean go back to that? What else is there still to do?

 

REX: Here, take a look. I have marked three sections (points to them)É hereÉ hereÉ and here.

 

OTTO (Puzzled): Left foot, torso and head?

 

REX: Minus the left ear! DonÕt skip that. ItÕs crossed out on the picture.

 

OTTO: OkayÉ no left ear. But what now?

 

REX: Before Dr. Hagen left our Institute for greener pastures in Berlin, he showed you how to do computer molding.

 

OTTO (Dismissive): IÕd learned computer modelling before I ever joined your lab.

 

REX (Sharply): OttoÉpay attention. I said Òcomputer moldingÓÉ not modelling.

 

OTTO (Embarrassed): Sorry.

 

REX: Well?

 

OTTO: Yes?

 

REX: How comfortable are you doing a careful molding job?

 

OTTO: Alone? Without help?

 

REX: I told you this is confidential.

 

OTTO: IÕll need to practice a bit.

 

REX: In that case, start practicingÉ today!

 

OTTO: And then what?

 

REX: I want plaster figuresÉ precise onesÉ of those three sections.

 

OTTO (AstonishedÉ pointing to the screen): Of this?

 

REX: None other than that young gentleman. As soon as theyÕre ready, you bring them to me for some finishing off. (Disingenuously). You knowÉ the masterÕs touches.

 

OTTO: To establish co-authorship?

 

REX: YouÕre a bit of a smart ass, arenÕt you Otto?

 

OTTO (Who, suitably chastened, starts scribbling in his notepad): And then?

 

REX: Make bronze castsÉ no more than 5 millimeters thickÉ and pay particular attention to the trace metal composition. Especially very low Nickel valuesÉ you knowÉ typical of the early Roman casts.

 

OTTO: You said Roman?

 

REX: GoodÉ youÕre now paying attention. And I want to see the complete atomic absorption data: tinÉ leadÉ zincÉ ironÉ silverÉ antimonyÉ as well as bismuth and cobalt.

 

OTTO: No arsenic?

 

REX: DidnÕt I mention arsenic? Of course, that too.

 

OTTO: You want me to make a Roman fake of these three sections?

 

REX: I want us to make Roman originals. At least so original that nobody can tell the differenceÉ with identical chemical fingerprints. Hence the atomic absorption.

 

OTTO: But—

 

REX: No buts. (Grins conspiratorially). I want you to search our patina data base for plausible values. You and I will assume that these parts here were dug up near a latrineÉ an old latrineÉ in fact very old and then covered with earth that had been farmed with fertilizer used in Spain in the 19th and 20th century.

 

OTTO (Realizing what Rex is driving at): You mean harsh enough conditions to explain why the sculpture—

 

REX (Pleased):É the thin, Roman sculptureÉ not a thick 16th century versionÉ ended up in pieces. You knowÉ action of ammonia, phosphatesÉ you name it.

 

OTTO: I canÕt.

 

REX: What do you mean, ÒI canÕtÓ?

 

OTTO: I canÕt make a fake.

 

REX: WhoÕs asking you to make a fake?

 

OTTO: A fake that looks like an originalÉ even if undetectableÉ is still a fake.

 

REX: DonÕt you think that depends on its eventual use?

 

OTTO: Meaning?

 

REX: If you tried to peddle what you call the fake as an original for lots of money and succeeded, then it would be a fraud, which, of course, is illegal.

 

OTTO: I am relieved to hear that.

 

REX: But suppose you used it to make a point in an academic disputeÉ and dress it up as a joke without exchange of money?

 

OTTO: Academic dispute?

 

REX: Show the other party to be wrong by telling them that itÕs been faked. And do it in privateÉ not in public?

 

OTTO: Well, thatÕs different I suppose...

 

REX: And now get going. But donÕt forget! I shall add the finishing touches before the bronze casting, but youÕll watch me. I need a witness. In fact, I need moreÉ I need an active accomplice who knows when to keep his mouth shut.

 

 

Scene 24. A few months later.  ReginaÕs office and Emma on a city street, with a mobile phone

 

The phone rings. Regina answers.

 

REGINA: Dr Leitner-Opferman speaking.

 

EMMA: ItÕs Emma.

 

REGINA: Where are you?

 

EMMA: IÕm in Belgium.

 

REGINA: What have you found there?

 

EMMA: Some documents in Namur. Don Juan of Austria died here.

 

REGINA: WhatÕs in the documents?

 

 

Scene 25 FOURTH DON JUAN/BARBARA BLOMBERG INTERMEZZO)

 

DON JUAN: Madam! I wish you would just tell me what you want. What is it? Forgiveness? Reconciliation with your long lost illegitimate son? I am afraid itÕs impossible. The King would not allow it.

 

BLOMBERG: My son. Permit me to suggest a gift the King cannot refuse.

 

DON JUAN: There is nothing my brother cannot refuse.

 

BLOMBERG: That maybe soÉ but he will not refuse this gift. It will be of no consequence to his Majesty, but if you request it, I shall depart in peace even if I shall never set eyes again on you.

 

DON JUAN (Now curious): What gift?

 

BLOMBERG: The sculpture.

 

DON JUAN (Puzzled): What sculpture?

 

BLOMBERG: Of Roman origin, it is saidÉ found in Carinthia.

 

DON JUAN (Still puzzled): But why that?

 

BLOMBERG: You may never have been born, had I not stood in front of it when the Emperor passed.

 

DON JUAN: Oh that one!

 

BLOMBERG: It is now in Regensburg. Request itÉ to remind you of your mother whenever you gaze on it.

 

DON JUAN (Bemused): A giftÉ desired by youÉ for meÉ from my brother? WhoÕd surely refuse it if he knew its purpose? (Beat). An engaging thoughtÉ and devious and therefore more engaging.

 

BLOMBERG: Nobody need know the source of this request.

 

DON JUAN: IndeedÉ nobody. Hmm. (Nods to himself). Describe the sculpture.

 

BLOMBERG (Eagerly): A young Roman manÉ beautiful (shyly)É like you, Sire.

 

DON JUAN (Raises hand to restrain her): How tall?

 

BLOMBERG: Like my son. (Hesitates). ButÉ

 

DON JUAN: Yes?

 

BLOMBERG: É he was naked.

 

DON JUAN (Smiling): As is his Venus.

 

BLOMBERG (Puzzled): His Venus? I do not understand.

 

DON JUAN: A gift from Francesco de Medici to my brotherÉ and now standing in the Royal Gardens in Aranjuez. (Slyly). Why not couple my naked man with his naked Venus? (Beat). Indeed, why not? Even my prim brother will concur. After allÉ a liaison of two bronzes is no offence.

 

 

Scene 26 A few weeks later.  ReginaÕs office.  GERALDO LOPEZ (OTTO in disguise, wearing moustache) enters.

 

REGINA: Sorry you were kept waiting.  Please, sit down.

 

He carries a large bag by his side.  He removes and unpacks its contents as the conversation progresses.

 

REGINA (Reading his business card): Ah yes, here we areÉ Instituto Roberto Hernandez, Aranjuez, Espagna? What precisely does your institute do, Sr. Lopez?

 

LOPEZ (Throughout with perceptible Spanish accent): Our institute is named after the founder of Iberian dinosaurology-

 

REGINA: Saurology?

 

LOPEZ: DinoÉ saurology. The study of dinosaurs.

 

REGINA (Condescending smile): My dear Sr. LopezÉ I afraid you are in the wrong place. You want the Museum of Natural History, which is across from us. On the other side of the Statue of Empress Maria Theresa.

 

LOPEZ (Reaches into his bag and removes a small object). This item is bronze.

 

REGINA: Oh!

 

LOPEZ: A foot. A human oneÉ not a dinosaurÕs.

 

REGINA: A right foot. (Picks it up). Oh my God!

 

LOPEZ (Feigning concern): Anything wrong?

 

REGINA (Recovers): NoÉ nothing. Nothing at all. Where did you find this?

 

LOPEZ: In Spain.

 

REGINA: But where in Spain?

 

LOPEZ: You know my country?

 

REGINA (Impatient): YesÉ yes.

 

LOPEZ: In a digÉ near my city.

 

REGINA: Aranjuez?

 

LOPEZ: You know my city? We have wonderful strawberries. Espectacular strawberries.

 

REGINA (Again picking up the foot, but now stroking it almost affectionately as she examines it, turning it over and over in her hand): How did you find this?

 

LOPEZ: Dinosaurologists follow one rule: When in doubt, donÕt throw it away. (Beat). Since this was bronze, I was tempted, butÉ

 

REGINA: Yes?

 

LOPEZ: It seemed old.