PHALLACY
ÒÉ not only
interesting but fully captivating. The play is similar in tone to plays such as
Tom StoppardÕs
Arcadia or Carey PerloffÕs Luminescence Dating. In Mr. DjerassiÕs capable
hands, the conflict between science and art and truth and beauty has rarely
been this engaging. Or, indeed, funnyÉ. If you enjoy witty academic banter,
philosophy or great art, this is the show for you.Ó
Duncan Pflaster in www.broadwayworld.com (New York, May 19, 2007)
ÒÉ a smart black comedyÉ a
search for truth as well as the delving into what makes up a personÕs passion.Ó
Lisa Ferber in www.nytheatre.com
(New York, May 16, 2007)
ÒMr. Djerassi has the
ingredients for some funny stuff here, and when he seizes the opportunity the
jokes land.Ó
Neil
Genzlinger in New York Times (May
25, 2007).
Òmultiple strains of
scholarship and streams of Shavian banterÉ impressive writing and lively
performancesÓ
James Hannaham in The Village Voice (New York, May 29, 2007)
ÒÉ a portrait of the confrontational
relationship between two experts, with their banter, some of it quite funny,
defining the issues... amusing and edifying to watch them in action.Ó
William Wolf in Wolf Entertainment Guide (New
York, May 2007)
ÒAs an expose of bias on both sides of the
divide, DjerassiÕs play is itself wonderfully unbiased. Psychosexual as well as comic reliefÉ a
fine theatre experience.Ó
Rick Mullin in Chem. & Eng. News (June 4, 2007)
ÒA comedy of academic
mannersÉ keeps the proceedings lively, never allowing intellectuality to stand
in the way of a good joke. ThereÕs even a touch of animate-inanimate eroticism.Ó
The
New Yorker (June 4, 2007)
ÒÉintriguing and
thought-provoking stuff, and very well actedÓ
Julia
Hickman in Theatreworld Internet Magazine (London, April 16, 2005)
ÒÉ a satirical black
comedy about academic infightingÉ a happily satisfying mix of broad humour and
thought-provoking comment.Ó
Gerald Berkowitz in Theatreguide London (April 17, 2005)
ÒPhallacy is knowingly clever, it requires your
concentration, but it manages to be playful as wellÉ. A mixture of farce and
thrillerÉbeautiful setÉfluid productionÓ
Heather Neill in Whatsonstage.com (London, April 18, 2005)
ÒScience and arts in
stylish conflictÉ strongly played characters in an entertaining and jocular
relationshipÉ witty and light-heartedÉ anybody who fears intellectual overkill
can rest at ease. Like Tom StoppardÕs Arcadia, Phallacy is cleverly stagedÉÓ
Rachel Calton in Camden New Journal (London, April 21, 2005)
ÒWhat is the true value of
art? In Carl DjerassiÕs play, Viennese art historian Regina Leitner-Opfermann says
Òart is never necessary, simply indispensableÓÉ but the true fascination of
this piece is the battle that rages on between Rex and Regina—played with
gusto by Karen Archer and Jack Klaff.Ó
Aline Waites in Ham & High (London, April 22, 2005)
ÒBeyond the clash between
scientific and artistic approaches to art, what holds the interest in Andy
JordanÕs slick and expensive-looking production are the fascinating methods
deployed by experts in attributing a work of artÕs origin. On this, Djerassi
knows his stuff, giving the sense that both we and the play are in the hands of
a capable playwright and an expert scientist.Ó
John
Nathan in The JC Jewish Chronicle
(London, April 22, 2005
ÒOne
of the classic problems of story-telling is how to get across essential
information to the audience, and both the science and the art historical
information in the play is clearly transmitted and convincing. And a period
storylineÉ serves to humanize the ultimate goals behind both academic
disciplines in question, and to put their grandiose debate into perspective.
They also bolster director Andy JordanÕs intriguing staging before the opening
lines, when modern and historical characters swirl through the set in an oddly
touching, timeless parade of museum-goers. Éfun, non-strenuous satire.Ó
Jennifer
Rohn in LabLit.com (London, April
23, 2005)
ÒA debate on what makes
art original and whether science or art can best capture human realityÉ ItÕs
all high-concept stuff, and there are plenty of thoughtful juxtapositions along
the way.Ó
Helen Chappell in WhatÕs On (London, April 26, 2005)
ÒThis is an unusual, light
and enjoyable play, recommended especiallyÉ Michael TaylorÕs set would do a
West End production proudÉ one of the most attractive and realistic set seen
for a long time.Ó
Lastminute.com (London, April 27, 2005)
"Phallacy
is an intriguing
play, well acted, fast moving and embracing a host of questions and human
situations that are rarely touched upon in modern theatreÉ an appealing and
thought-provoking new production."
Robin
Clark in Nature (April 28, 2005)
ÒPhallacy is the latest of eminent chemist DjerassiÕs
Ôscience-in-theatreÕ plays. Suggested by a true story, the piece is packed with
fascinating scientific and art historical facts, but is at its best dramatically
when it concentrates on academic satire.Ó
Robert Shore in Time Out London (May 4, 2005)
ÒPart detective story,
part satire of academic infighting, the play rolls along enjoyably under Andy
JordanÕs fluid direction, comfortably mixing broad comedy with
thought-provoking debate.Ó
Gerald Berkowitz in The Stage (London, May 5, 2005).
ÒPhallacy is fast and funny, and captures well the
bull-headedness of old-style museum curatorsÉ Djerassi makes a fun and furious
play of it.Ó
Josie
Appleton in Culture Wars—Institute of Ideas (London, May 18, 2005)
ÒThis is gripping,
intelligent theatreÉÓ
Lionel Milgrom in ChemistryWorld (London, June 2005)
ÒDjerassi manages to make
complex scientific, art historical and philosophical ideas accessible, even
entertaining, and Andy JordanÕs lively, slick production brings out the best in
the play.Ó
Melanie
Branton in TheatreWorld (London,
June 2005)
ÒÉ an elegantly crafted
drama about the conflicts of art and science... bracingly actedÓ
Mark
Shenton in Sunday Express (London, June 5, 2005)